Pages

Saturday, August 16, 2025

I would not call myself a dispensationlist, but rather a biblical covenantalist

1. The Noahic Covenant: Still in Effect

The Noahic Covenant, established in Genesis 9:8–17, is a universal promise from God to Noah, his descendants, and every living creature. God pledged never again to destroy the earth with a flood, with the rainbow as the sign of this covenant.

• Evidence of Continuation: The promise is explicitly eternal, as God states, “never again shall there be a flood to destroy the earth” (Genesis 9:11, ESV). The continued existence of the earth without a global flood and the recurring appearance of rainbows affirm that this covenant remains active.

• Implication: Since God’s promise is unconditional and perpetual, the Noahic Covenant is still in effect, as the condition (no global flood) continues to hold true.

2. The Abrahamic Covenant: Unfulfilled Land Promises

The Abrahamic Covenant, initiated in Genesis 12:1–3 and expanded in Genesis 15:18–21 and 17:1–8, includes promises of land, descendants, and blessing to all nations through Abraham’s seed. While some aspects, such as the birth of Isaac and the blessing through Christ (Galatians 3:16), have been fulfilled, the land promise remains incomplete.

• Unfulfilled Element: God promised Abraham’s descendants a specific territory, from the river of Egypt to the Euphrates (Genesis 15:18). Historically, Israel’s possession under Joshua or Solomon never fully encompassed this vast region (e.g., Joshua 21:43–45 shows partial fulfillment, but not the full extent described). Modern Israel’s borders also fall short of this promise.

• Literal Expectation: The precise geographical boundaries suggest a literal fulfillment. Spiritualizing the land as a metaphor (e.g., heaven or spiritual blessing) contradicts the specificity of the promise. The literal fulfillment of Abraham’s seed through Isaac and Christ supports the expectation that the land promise will also be literally fulfilled, likely in the eschatological future (e.g., during the Messianic kingdom, as implied in Romans 11:26–29).

• Implication: The Abrahamic Covenant remains open because the full extent of the land promise awaits fulfillment.

3. The Mosaic Covenant: Ongoing Relevance

The Mosaic Covenant, established at Sinai (Exodus 19–24), is a conditional covenant where God promised blessings for Israel’s obedience and curses for disobedience (Deuteronomy 28). While some argue it was fulfilled or superseded by the New Covenant (Hebrews 8:13), elements suggest it remains relevant.

• Unfulfilled Element: The covenant includes promises of restoration after disobedience (Deuteronomy 30:1–10), where God will gather Israel from dispersion, circumcise their hearts, and bless them in the land. Israel’s partial restoration (e.g., post-Babylonian exile or modern Israel) has not fully realized the promised spiritual renewal or permanent security in the land.

• Literal Expectation: The detailed restoration promises, tied to specific blessings in the land, align with a literal interpretation. The New Covenant (Jeremiah 31:31–34) fulfills the spiritual transformation aspect (heart circumcision), but the physical restoration of Israel awaits completion, as seen in prophecies like Ezekiel 36:24–28.

• Implication: The Mosaic Covenant’s restoration promises remain open, pointing to a future literal fulfillment.

4. The Davidic Covenant: A Future King

The Davidic Covenant, established in 2 Samuel 7:12–16, promises that David’s throne will be established forever, with a descendant ruling eternally.

• Unfulfilled Element: While Jesus, the Son of David, fulfills the ultimate role as the eternal King (Luke 1:32–33), He has not yet assumed the literal throne in Jerusalem to rule over Israel and the nations, as promised. The current absence of a Davidic king on a physical throne in Israel indicates this promise awaits fulfillment.

• Literal Expectation: The promise specifies a throne and kingdom (2 Samuel 7:13), tied to Israel’s monarchy. Spiritualizing this as Christ’s current spiritual reign ignores the physical and political dimensions of the promise, as seen in prophecies like Zechariah 14:9, where the Lord will reign as king over the earth. The literal fulfillment of messianic prophecies (e.g., Christ’s birth in Bethlehem, Micah 5:2) supports a literal future reign.

• Implication: The Davidic Covenant remains open, awaiting Christ’s return to establish His eternal kingdom.

5. Pattern of Literal Fulfillment in Messianic Prophecies

The argument for literal fulfillment is strengthened by the Old Testament messianic prophecies, which were fulfilled precisely in Jesus’ first coming. Examples include:

• Micah 5:2: Predicted the Messiah’s birth in Bethlehem, fulfilled literally (Matthew 2:1).

• Isaiah 7:14: Foretold a virgin birth, fulfilled literally in Mary (Matthew 1:22–23).

• Psalm 22:16–18: Described crucifixion details, fulfilled literally in Jesus’ death (John 19:23–24).

This pattern suggests that unfulfilled promises, such as those in the covenants, are also intended for literal fulfillment, not spiritual or figurative interpretation. For instance, Christ’s second coming (Zechariah 14:4; Acts 1:11) is described with specific physical details (e.g., standing on the Mount of Olives), reinforcing a literal expectation.

6. Eschatological Fulfillment

The unfulfilled aspects of these covenants converge in eschatological prophecies, particularly surrounding Christ’s second coming. Revelation 20:4–6 describes a future reign of Christ, which aligns with the Davidic promise of an eternal throne. Ezekiel 37:24–28 links the restoration of Israel (Abrahamic and Mosaic) with David’s descendant ruling over them in the land. These passages indicate that the open covenants will find their ultimate fulfillment in the Messianic kingdom, not in a spiritualized sense but in a tangible, physical reality.

Counterarguments and Response

Some may argue that these covenants are fulfilled spiritually in the church or Christ’s current reign, citing passages like Hebrews 8:13 (Mosaic Covenant obsolete) or Galatians 3:28–29 (church as Abraham’s seed). However:

• Response: While the New Covenant fulfills spiritual aspects (e.g., forgiveness of sins, Jeremiah 31:34), the physical promises (land, throne) remain specific to Israel and are not transferred to the church. Romans 11:25–29 affirms God’s irrevocable promises to Israel.

• Literal vs. Spiritual: The consistent literal fulfillment of messianic prophecies undermines spiritualizing unfulfilled promises, as God’s pattern is precise and tangible.

Conclusion

The Noahic, Abrahamic, Mosaic, and Davidic covenants remain open because their full promises have not been realized. The Noahic Covenant persists as God upholds His pledge against a global flood. The Abrahamic Covenant awaits the complete possession of the promised land. The Mosaic Covenant anticipates Israel’s full restoration. The Davidic Covenant looks to Christ’s literal reign on David’s throne. The precedent of literal messianic fulfillments supports the expectation that these promises will be realized physically in the future, particularly at Christ’s second coming, rather than being spiritualized. Thus, these covenants remain active, testifying to God’s faithfulness to His literal promises.

No comments:

Post a Comment